| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Questions about the continuity of WAL archiving |
| Date: | 2025-08-15 16:40:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmLgGRZsLH7crTHmr5DCpdz-FnLy7kwCsa-wJ83Q948iew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 3:20 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> File creation time in S3 is relatively slow so backup/restore
> performance is improved by enabling file bundling.
>
Just to be clear for the archives, pgbackrest's file bundling only applies
to backups, not to WAL, which is the OP is dealing with here.
Pixian Shi, what sort of WAL volume are we dealing with? (in WALs generated
per minute)
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-08-15 16:45:54 | Re: pgbackrest check info fails without success |
| Previous Message | Evelina Angelova | 2025-08-15 06:49:26 | RE: help with upgrade from v15 to v16 rhel z/linux needed |