| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Florin Irion <irionr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com" <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "bohyun(dot)lee(at)databricks(dot)com" <bohyun(dot)lee(at)databricks(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade_replica: avoid full re-clone of standbys after pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2026-09-07 17:59:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmLSGSdA=UyTNLMb8u9OLq-qcRmDqC-xt7TK_PWBDHSaGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 7, 2026 at 11:55 AM Florin Irion <irionr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed the pg_upgrade_replica implementation, and I couldn't
> spot any issue.
>
Did you review it though? And found no issues at all? Because this looks
like an LLM-generated response. It's all generic positive stuff, organized
into small paragraphs. No actual technical review. No "but what about..."
or "on line such and such, why did you...". It provides no value to this
list. Also not clear why you cc'd other people - it's usually polite to
spell out why you did so.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-09-07 18:20:14 | Re: Assert failure in try_nestloop_path() |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2026-09-07 17:58:57 | Re: Concurrent DROP TABLESPACE can miss a shared dependency |