Re: On disable_cost

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zhenghua Lyu <zlyu(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On disable_cost
Date: 2024-04-03 20:03:44
Message-ID: CAKAnmmKkz4Oo_04UHk51u=R200XvOiuyKF=+Gx1H-o4577v9Tw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:21 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> It's also pretty clear to me that the fact that enable_indexscan
> and enable_indexonlyscan work completely differently from each other
> is surprising at best, wrong at worst, but here again, what this patch
> does about that is not above reproach.

Yes, that is wrong, surely there is a reason we have two vars. Thanks for
digging into this: if nothing else, the code will be better for this
discussion, even if we do nothing for now with disable_cost.

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2024-04-03 20:04:26 Re: Opportunistically pruning page before update
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-03 20:02:47 Re: Statistics Import and Export