Re: [PATCH] Harden recovery/t/051_effective_wal_level against WAL recycling

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Harden recovery/t/051_effective_wal_level against WAL recycling
Date: 2026-08-13 15:26:02
Message-ID: CAKAnmmK3gXncaAuWhQ9V_OoFq_UEpGHjF3K=d1cUUH2i=EsOFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 11:45 PM Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The fix takes a fresh backup immediately before each of them, so the start
> point is recent and within retained WAL regardless of what the earlier part
> of the test produced.
>

A new backup seems a little expensive, could we just create a slot?

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2026-08-13 15:35:09 Re: Disallow outer-level and WHERE-clause aggregates in GRAPH_TABLE
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-08-13 15:23:00 Re: Clarify or fix SIGINT handling in data checksums launcher