Re: Signatures and code of conduct

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Signatures and code of conduct
Date: 2026-04-09 17:46:17
Message-ID: CAKAnmmJtzcCDr0xgzjnFATzuQcrNeKFDko1imgJq_gHhwCRZ+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 10:56 AM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> If you believe it is, there are guidelines for reporting such conduct to
> those responsible for enforcing the guidelines.
>

Would have been great to provide the link:

https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/coc/

> Promoting a public discussion is more likely to make things worse, not
> better. That why the committee exists.
>

I prefer transparency, especially about a somewhat meta question like this.
IMHO, nothing about that particular sig violates anything in our Code of
Conduct. Political views are allowed. Personal attacks are not.

Cheers,
Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KK CHN 2026-04-10 07:07:22 Re: Pgbouncer and Node JS application Query read timeout error
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2026-04-09 14:56:34 Re: Signatures and code of conduct