| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |
| Date: | 2025-10-07 19:20:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmJHe5iHDQwFJf0t6DuBMFJoxotP-njEo=Y8NgCyoGi-hA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 3:15 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> One of the take-away lessons from this thread for me is that the TPC-*
>> benchmarks are far removed from real world queries. (Maybe if we ask an LLM
>> to use an ORM to implement TPC-H? Ha ha ha!)
>
>
To be clear, I'm saying that TPC queries are written by sane adults that
know what they are doing, but perhaps lowering rpc tends to help more when
the queries are not well-written SQL (which many consultants would argue is
the majority of production queries).
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-10-07 19:25:08 | Re: Add mode column to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-10-07 19:15:02 | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |