| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |
| Date: | 2025-06-13 01:36:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmJCHTfD=qW=Dy-8RPOEdz10MwGjxAo8tf7gJgWad2-9JQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 4:12 PM Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
(peacefully skimming thread...)
...
> If we're hot to remove options, how about we remove the sections flags?
> Their utility is reliant upon the user understanding exactly which things
> go in which section, and further assumes that everything deterministically
> goes in exactly one section, which is no longer the case as Jeff
> pointed out recently. They have outlived their usefulness.
[record scratch sound]
Wait, what?! Big -1. Guess we can debate this more for v19.
For this current discussion (--statistics-only), I'm a +1 for keeping
things as they are now, in the name of intuitiveness.
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-06-13 01:42:20 | Re: [WIP PATCH v2] Implement "pg_restore --data-only --clean" as a way to skip WAL |
| Previous Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2025-06-13 01:18:04 | Re: Add progressive backoff to XactLockTableWait functions |