Re: PostgreSQL include directive in plpgsql language PL/pgSQL

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PALAYRET Jacques <jacques(dot)palayret(at)meteo(dot)fr>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL include directive in plpgsql language PL/pgSQL
Date: 2025-09-08 13:13:33
Message-ID: CAKAnmmJ6syFLs7MTx8KekASLRM4A8NXq+N0R963_NF72S-oF9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 5:37 AM PALAYRET Jacques <jacques(dot)palayret(at)meteo(dot)fr>
wrote:

> I can manage with this method, but it shoud be better with a include
> directive.
>

Even if we had includes, I would strongly advise "this method" which seems
pretty clean and maintainable. What is the issue with SQL functions that
call a parent function and slightly manipulate the results?

Cheers,
Greg

--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message legrand legrand 2025-09-08 15:03:41 Fast switchover
Previous Message Alec Cozens 2025-09-08 10:27:31 RE: LWLock SerializableFinishedList