Re: minimum Meson version

From: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minimum Meson version
Date: 2025-06-18 17:22:10
Message-ID: CAKAnmm+k+w=rCaK+usBLRjLxsJDsR63pvMgLgGPH5V1WbqXdZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:35 AM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
wrote:

> And what I just don't understand about this whole discussion: We're
> talking about people who want to be frozen in time for 5 years
> straight during this "maintenance support" window by the vendor (whom they
> are paying), with only access to security fixes. But somehow they do want
> to run the latest Postgres Major release, even though the one that they had
> running still receives bug fixes and security fixes. I just don't
> understand who these people are.

These are companies in which upgrading the OS is a Very Big Involved
Process, but they would still like to run a recent version of Postgres.

Cheers,
Greg

--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-06-18 17:27:36 Re: minimum Meson version
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-06-18 17:21:37 Re: pg_dump --with-* options