From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Adding locks statistics |
Date: | 2025-08-11 17:54:38 |
Message-ID: | CAKAnmm+USTr5MeKuyrAvbCjHqbSFbZ+czJsV7fPYt9nECQkf-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Great idea. +1. Here is a quick overall review to get things started.
Meta:
patch did not apply via "git apply". Also has carriage returns (e.g. DOS
file), and some errant whitespace. Seems to pass pgindent, though.
Name:
I think the name would read better as pg_stat_locks, especially as it
returns multiple rows.
Docs: seem good. Needs a section on how to reset via
SELECT pg_stat_reset_shared('lock');
Also plural better here ('locks')
Code:
+ * Copyright (c) 2021-2025, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
If a new file, we can simply say 2025?
+ LWLock locks[LOCKTAG_LAST_TYPE + 1];
+ PgStat_Lock stats;
Adding a lock to the system that counts locks! :) (just found amusing, not
a comment)
-#define PGSTAT_KIND_SLRU 11
-#define PGSTAT_KIND_WAL 12
+#define PGSTAT_KIND_LOCK 11
+#define PGSTAT_KIND_SLRU 12
+#define PGSTAT_KIND_WAL 13
Why not just add LOCK as #13?
What about the overhead of maintaining this system? I know it's overall
very lightweight, but from my testing, the relation locktype in particular
is very, very busy. Busier than I realized until I saw it in this useful
view!
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-08-11 17:55:57 | Re: Extension security improvement: Add support for extensions with an owned schema |
Previous Message | Doruk Yilmaz | 2025-08-11 17:11:34 | Re: [Patch] add new parameter to pg_replication_origin_session_setup |