| From: | Tom DalPozzo <t(dot)dalpozzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order? |
| Date: | 2016-11-03 11:16:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAK77FCQ1MP3_5YkMaRdZtOv58k_MHGfXh4tcqwq_uoizHfFQ=A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
so if I understand right, the ...DE file's previous name, was less than
...C6, then it was renamed in big advance for later use. I was missing this
advance.
Thanks!
Pupillo
2016-11-03 11:45 GMT+01:00 hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:28:57AM +0100, Tom DalPozzo wrote:
> > What am I missing?
>
> David already explained, but you might want to read also:
> https://www.depesz.com/2011/07/14/write-ahead-log-
> understanding-postgresql-conf-checkpoint_segments-
> checkpoint_timeout-checkpoint_warning/
>
> depesz
>
> --
> The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact
> with it.
>
> http://depesz.com/
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-11-03 13:20:39 | Re: Recover from corrupted database due to failing disk |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2016-11-03 10:45:55 | Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order? |