| From: | Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
| Date: | 2018-02-03 15:19:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAJvoCuvvjQuQMVYRfN-t1eLQCqunb4ceT1odZLowKegHZ3HC2Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 at 5:14 pm, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> If I am right my recommendation for getting this patch in is to
> initially skip the new operators and go back to the version of the patch
> which uses @>.
We really need an initial patch to get accepted and postpone anything that
won't affect the core mechanics of the patch.
So yes, I move towards delaying the introduction of @>> to the patch.
A new patch will be ready by tomorrow.
Besr Regards,
Mark Rofail
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Seltenreich | 2018-02-03 19:57:24 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2018-02-03 15:14:32 | Re: pie-in-sky idea: 'sensitive' function parameters |