Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays

From: Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Date: 2017-07-27 00:31:41
Message-ID: CAJvoCuv6ufngfZBPNq4icCy=x6NpqVVyyPaio97ZHcZVvAC+Zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have written some benchmark test.

With two tables a PK table with 5 rows and an FK table with growing row
count.

Once triggering an RI check
at 10 rows,
100 rows,
1,000 rows,
10,000 rows,
100,000 rows and
1,000,000 rows

Please find the graph with the findings attached below

Attachment Content-Type Size
FK Benchmark.jpg image/jpeg 404.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2017-07-27 01:14:35 Missing comment for max_logical_replication_workers in postgresql.conf.sample
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-07-27 00:31:12 Re: Refreshing subscription relation state inside a transaction block