Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays

From: Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Date: 2018-01-12 19:47:19
Message-ID: CAJvoCusCfrW3r2HF3rGi_hAbkbxZg_ApPK=NsOj1eeBqFck9Sg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

According to the last review, there are still two main issues with the
patch.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:

> 1) MATCH FULL does not seem to care about NULLS in arrays. In the example
> below I expected both inserts into the referring table to fail.
>
> CREATE TABLE t (x int, y int, PRIMARY KEY (x, y));
> CREATE TABLE fk (x int, ys int[], FOREIGN KEY (x, EACH ELEMENT OF ys)
> REFERENCES t MATCH FULL);
> INSERT INTO t VALUES (10, 1);
> INSERT INTO fk VALUES (10, '{1,NULL}');
> INSERT INTO fk VALUES (NULL, '{1}');
>
> CREATE TABLE
> CREATE TABLE
> INSERT 0 1
> INSERT 0 1
> ERROR: insert or update on table "fk" violates foreign key constraint
> "fk_x_fkey"
> DETAIL: MATCH FULL does not allow mixing of null and nonnull key values.
>
> I understand that Match full should contain nulls in the results. However,
I don't think that it's semantically correct, so I suggest we don't use
Match full. What would be the consequences of that ?

2) I think the code in RI_Initial_Check() would be cleaner if you used
> "CROSS JOIN LATERAL unnest(col)" rather than having unnest() in the target
> list. This way you would not need to rename all columns and the code paths
> for the array case could look more like the code path for the normal case.
>
I have repeatedly tried to generate the suggested query using C code and I
failed. I would like some help with it

Best Regards,
Mark Rofail

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-01-12 19:55:07 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Previous Message David Fetter 2018-01-12 19:39:05 Re: CREATE ROUTINE MAPPING