| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Alastair Turner <minion(at)decodable(dot)me>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed patch for key management |
| Date: | 2020-12-31 18:41:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAJvJg-RF2DdA6ugSCkCDeGnUYYuMHjxnTgDYj7n89H3Vum9WSA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:47 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I will say that if the community feels external-only should be the only
> option, I will stop working on this feature because I feel the result
> would be too fragile to be reliable, and I would not want to be
> associated with it.
>
>
I can say that the people that I work with would prefer an "officially"
supported mechanism from Postgresql.org. The use of a generic API would be
useful for the ecosystem who wants to build on core functionality but
Postgresql should have competent built-in support as well.
JD
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Drake | 2020-12-31 18:46:57 | Re: Proposed patch for key management |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2020-12-31 17:54:07 | Re: Buildfarm's cross-version-upgrade tests |