| From: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query |
| Date: | 2017-12-13 01:09:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAJrrPGfBYWWK+qoMbm8swqwY8HWehSYbbTYcBH+QybdviQzKFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Could this question be answered? The patch still applies so I am
> >> moving it to next CF.
>
> Rebased, 'cause it broke.
Thanks for explaining the problem in generating an isolation test to
test the serialize parallel query.
Committer can decide whether existing test is fine to part of the test suite
or remove it, other than that everything is fine. so I am moving the patch
into "ready for committer" state.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-12-13 01:26:40 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-12-13 01:01:19 | pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions. |