Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)
Date: 2017-01-17 03:40:15
Message-ID: CAJrrPGehOXE6FfhVbNuJd=NfhwVd3AdE9gEQ8_+4u_Jjs0+aMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 02:55:39PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fujitsu was interested in developing a columnar storage extension with
> minimal
> > changes the server backend.
> >
> > The columnar store is implemented as an extension using index access
> methods.
> > This can be easily enhanced with pluggable storage methods once they are
> > available.
>
> Have you see this post from 2015:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150831225328.GM2912%
> 40alvherre.pgsql
>

Thanks for the information.
Yes, I already checked that mail thread. The proposal in that thread was
trying to add
the columnar storage in the core itself. The patch that is proposed is an
extension to
provide columnar storage with the help of index.

May be we can discuss the pros and cons in adding columnar store in the
core itself
or a pluggable storage approach.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2017-01-17 03:48:19 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2017-01-17 03:30:15 Re: PoC: Grouped base relation