Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead follows log_file_mode permissions

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: current_logfiles not following group access and instead follows log_file_mode permissions
Date: 2019-03-22 03:35:41
Message-ID: CAJrrPGe6j+RhR5VKnWC9MptKPP1TdzKzU7sderTfGHs_jGA7HQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:24 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:52:14PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > Earlier attached patch is wrong.
>
> - oumask = umask(pg_file_create_mode);
> + oumask = umask(pg_mode_mask);
> Indeed that was wrong.
>
> > Correct patch attached. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> This looks better for the umask setting, still it could be more
> simple.
>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> -
> +#include "common/file_perm.h"
> #include "lib/stringinfo.h"
> Nit: it is better for readability to keep an empty line between the
> system includes and the Postgres ones.
>
> A second thing, more important, is that you can reset umask just after
> opening the file, as attached. This way there is no need to reset the
> umask in all the code paths leaving update_metainfo_datafile(). Does
> that look fine to you?
>

Thanks for the correction, Yes, that is correct and it works fine.

Regards,
Haribabu Kommi
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2019-03-22 03:45:24 Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions
Previous Message John Naylor 2019-03-22 02:38:16 Re: jsonpath