Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Date: 2016-12-02 12:38:31
Message-ID: CAJrrPGdrFc6fT=bsJWxqxyVpeP_=vWCiNY9RWAZpzHVBbOBsWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> Obviously I'm actively working on developing and stabilising all this.
> Some of the things I'm working on are: work_mem accounting, batch
> increases, rescans and figuring out if the resource management for
> those BufFiles is going to work. There are quite a lot of edge cases
> some of which I'm still figuring out, but I feel like this approach is
> workable. At this stage I want to share what I'm doing to see if
> others have feedback, ideas, blood curdling screams of horror, etc. I
> will have better patches and a set of test queries soon. Thanks for
> reading.
>
>
This patch doesn't receive any review. Patch is not applying properly to
HEAD.
Moved to next CF with "waiting on author" status.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-12-02 12:45:27 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2016-12-02 12:36:33 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)