Re: ANALYZE command progress checker

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ANALYZE command progress checker
Date: 2017-03-21 12:25:00
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:41 PM, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>

> Thank you for testing the patch on Windows platform.
Thanks for the updated patch.

It works good for a normal relation. But for a relation that contains
child tables,
the PROGRESS_ANALYZE_NUM_ROWS_SAMPLED produces wrong results.

How about adding another phase called
and set this phase only when it is an inheritance analyze operation. And
some explanation of ROWS_SAMPLED phase about inheritance tables
how these sampled rows are calculated will provide good analyze progress of
relation that contains child relations also.

Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emre Hasegeli 2017-03-21 12:39:22 Re: BRIN cost estimate
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2017-03-21 12:21:50 Re: Problem in Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan?