Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
Date: 2026-06-09 04:17:51
Message-ID: CAJpy0uDtXbK=enJh=kgOyah4LxnmsjYQwTJE0Cv-=wpXo1MP_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 10:36 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Ajin,
> I have reviewed the patch and here are some comments:
>
> 1. I want to clarify, what is the expected behaviour when we upgrade
> the postgres instance from version <= 16 to "HEAD + patch"?
> - ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(subid, InvalidOid, originname,
> sizeof(originname));
> - replorigin_create(originname);
> + if (!IsBinaryUpgrade)
> + {
> + ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(subid, InvalidOid,
> originname, sizeof(originname));
> + replorigin_create(originname);
> + }
> and
> + /* Dump replication origins */
> + if (server_version >= 170000 && binary_upgrade &&
> archDumpFormat == archNull)
> + dumpReplicationOrigins(conn);
>
> When the postgres instance with subscription is updated from PG 16 (or
> less) to HEAD, the replication origin is created as we do not have "if
> (!IsBinaryUpgrade)" check in HEAD,
> whereas when the similar instance is upgraded to "HEAD + patch", no
> replication origin is present after the upgrade.
> Is this difference in the behaviour between HEAD and "HEAD + patch" expected?
>

Good catch Shlok. IMO, the behaviour should be same even if we upgrade
to HEAD+patch, it should not result in the loss of origins.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henson Choi 2026-06-09 04:31:57 Re: Row pattern recognition
Previous Message Peter Smith 2026-06-09 04:14:27 Re: Parallel Apply