From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
Date: | 2025-09-12 08:47:31 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uDfHTGv0FY+GnY1vv5tNB-EVfh9tXAxrkyqtHZ96eBj1w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 8:55 AM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I agree. Here is a V73 patch that will restart the worker if the retention
> resumes. I also addressed other comments posted by Amit[1].
>
Thanks for the patch. Few comments:
1)
There is a small window where worker can exit while resuming
retention and launcher can end up acessign stale worker info.
Lets say launcher is at a stage where it has fetched worker:
w = logicalrep_worker_find(sub->oid, InvalidOid, false);
And after this point, before the launcher could do
compute_min_nonremovable_xid(), the worker has stopped retention and
resumed as well. Now the worker has exited but in
compute_min_nonremovable_xid(), launcher will still use the
worker-info fetched previously.
2)
if (should_stop_conflict_info_retention(rdt_data))
+ {
+ /*
+ * Stop retention if not yet. Otherwise, reset to the initial phase to
+ * retry all phases. This is required to recalculate the current wait
+ * time and resume retention if the time falls within
+ * max_retention_duration.
+ */
+ if (MySubscription->retentionactive)
+ rdt_data->phase = RDT_STOP_CONFLICT_INFO_RETENTION;
+ else
+ reset_retention_data_fields(rdt_data);
+
return;
+ }
Shall we have an Assert( !MyLogicalRepWorker->oldest_nonremovable_xid)
in 'else' part above?
thanks
Shveta
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chao Li | 2025-09-12 08:51:14 | Re: Add support for entry counting in pgstats |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-09-12 08:42:31 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |