Re: Skipping schema changes in publication

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, YeXiu <1518981153(at)qq(dot)com>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date: 2025-12-08 11:57:27
Message-ID: CAJpy0uDdQH7b=LRn_HevbmFACpvq9=c32Vb3tRvjSOnDsQd74w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 5:21 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have addressed these in the v29 patch.
> Will address comments for 0003 and 0004 patch by Peter and comments by
> Shveta in next version.
>

Thanks for the patch.

I believe patch 003 (EXCEPT table) and 004 (EXCEPT column_list) should
be the primary focus. The other patches, RESET and ADD ALL tables are
additional features and may or may not be necessary depending on
further input.

I suggest making 003 and 004 as 001 and 002 respectively, and
prioritizing these first. The RESET and ADD ALL tables patches can
become 003 and 004, and we can review them after the first 2 patches
are fully evaluated. The documentation formatting changes for ALTER
PUBLICATION are not required in this patch and, if needed, can be
handled separately.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavlo Golub 2025-12-08 12:09:58 [PATCH] Add pg_current_vxact_id() function to expose virtual transaction IDs
Previous Message David Geier 2025-12-08 11:51:05 Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly