Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication
Date: 2023-01-31 09:59:28
Message-ID: CAJpy0uDb4GW7-qYazMwv5s7temhXGW7vW3Ly6K21O-Hi6ub92w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:41 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>

>
> I am reviewing further...
> thanks
> Shveta

Few more comments:

v4-0001:

1)
REPLICATION_SLOT_SNAPSHOT
--Do we need 'CREATE' prefix with it i.e. CREATE_REPLICATION_SNAPSHOT
(or some other brief one with CREATE?). 'REPLICATION_SLOT_SNAPSHOT'
does not look like a command/action and thus is confusing.

2)
is used in the currenct transaction. This command is currently only supported
for logical replication.
slots.
--typo: currenct-->current
--slots can be moved to previous line

3)
/*
* Signal that we don't need the timeout mechanism. We're just creating
* the replication slot and don't yet accept feedback messages or send
* keepalives. As we possibly need to wait for further WAL the walsender
* would otherwise possibly be killed too soon.
*/
We're just creating the replication slot --> We're just creating the
replication snapshot

4)
I see XactReadOnly check in CreateReplicationSlot, do we need the same
in ReplicationSlotSnapshot() as well?

===============
v9-0002:

5)
/* We are safe to drop the replication trackin origin after this
--typo: tracking

6)
slot->data.catalog_xmin = xmin_horizon;
slot->effective_xmin = xmin_horizon;
SpinLockRelease(&slot->mutex);
xmin_horizon =
GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId(!need_full_snapshot);
ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin(true);

--do we need to set xmin_horizon in slot after
'GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId' call, otherwise it will be set to
InvalidId in slot. Is that intentional? I see that we do set this
correct xmin_horizon in builder->initial_xmin_horizon but the slot is
carrying Invalid one.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-31 10:21:12 Re: Named Operators
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-31 09:59:10 Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests