| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Date: | 2023-01-13 02:52:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uDKo7w0C93RTQV=KN_xg8VMB3GcAtuCrpPTMGcvbggKZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 4:37 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> But then do you suggest that tomorrow if we allow parallel sync
> workers then we have a separate column leader_sync_pid? I think that
> doesn't sound like a good idea and moreover one can refer to docs for
> clarification.
>
> --
okay, leader_pid is fine I think.
thanks
Shveta
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Will Mortensen | 2023-01-13 03:21:00 | Re: Exposing the lock manager's WaitForLockers() to SQL |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-01-13 02:43:54 | Re: Cygwin cleanup |