Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Yu Shi (Fujitsu)" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Date: 2023-06-09 03:10:40
Message-ID: CAJpy0uDFyZMgV2_Tm_gBw8uki_+xo1w6zxQOjE9NgW_6oM26UQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:31 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please find new set of patches addressing below:
> a) Issue mentioned by Wang-san in [1],
> b) Comments from Peter given in [2]
> c) Comments from Amit given in the last 2 emails.
>
> [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS3PR01MB62750D43D4F7F075B33BD2609E52A%40OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
> [2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPv9vPbUQc0fzrKmDkKOsS_bj-hup_E%2BsLHNEX%2B6F%2BSY5Q%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Thank You Vignesh for handling (a), Ajin for handling (b), Shi-san and
> Hou-san for contributing in (c).
>
> The new changes are in patch 0001, 0002, 0005 and 0008.
>

The patch 0005 has some issue in
'doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml' which makes documentation to
fail to compile. It will be fixed along with next-version. Please
review rest of the changes meanwhile. Sorry for inconvenience.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nim Li 2023-06-09 03:21:28 Question about where to deploy the business logics for data processing
Previous Message Pat Trainor 2023-06-09 02:17:59 How To: A large [2D] matrix, 100,000+ rows/columns

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gurjeet Singh 2023-06-09 03:16:18 Re: Fix last unitialized memory warning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-06-09 03:01:24 Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test