From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance |
Date: | 2025-09-23 04:59:18 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uDBui34KMqDKWo9gb9EURA67PO0NKEqMeyUu6E-MtGGGw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 4:21 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Created a patch v13 with these changes.
>
Please find a few comments:
1)
+ /* update the failure structure so that it can be freed on error */
+ fparams.slot_names = slot_names;
+
Since slot_names is assigned only once, we can make the above
assignment as well only once, inside the if-block where we initialize
slot_names.
2)
extract_slot_names():
+ foreach(lc, remote_slots)
+ {
+ RemoteSlot *remote_slot = (RemoteSlot *) lfirst(lc);
+ char *slot_name;
+
+ /* Switch to long-lived TopMemoryContext to store slot names */
+ oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(TopMemoryContext);
+
+ slot_name = pstrdup(remote_slot->name);
+ slot_names = lappend(slot_names, slot_name);
+
+ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
+ }
It will be better to move 'MemoryContextSwitchTo' calls outside of the
loop. No need to switch the context for each slot.
3)
ProcessSlotSyncAPIChanges() gives a feeling that it is actually
processing API changes where instead it is processing interrupts or
config changes. Can we please rename to ProcessSlotSyncAPIInterrupts()
4)
I prefer version 11's slotsync_api_reread_config() over current
slotsync_api_config_changed(). There, even error was taken care of
inside the function, which to me looked better and similar to how
slotsync worker deals with it.
I have made some comment changes, attached the patch. Please include
it if you find it okay.
thanks
Shveta
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-comments-changes.patch.txt | text/plain | 4.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-23 05:02:20 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce unified support for composite GUC options |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-09-23 04:50:45 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce unified support for composite GUC options |