| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2026-04-24 10:24:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uCJsx4wKuG0iOLxJuGJ-RQRrumvgC0rQ6=4-t6krXMSEg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 3:48 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 11:42 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 3:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Nisha for the review. All your comments make sense so I have
> > > fixed them in the latest patch.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Dilip,
> >
> > Before we resume review, could you summarize any pending design points
> > (if any) from our last discussion? Sorry, I have lost track, a summary
> > will help.
>
> Thanks Shveta, IIRC, there were no open design point, the last problem
> were related to user should not be able to modify the internally
> created conflict log table and for that we designed a pg_conflict
> schema. So maybe we can dig a bit deeper on this part related to
> whether we are ensuring all right sort of permissions on this schema.
>
Okay, thanks! Will review.
thanks
Shveta
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-04-24 10:29:08 | Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2026-04-24 10:18:37 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |