From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
Date: | 2025-09-01 12:15:31 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uC=J7kCO-3isUzvd+p+WoN+=Mvanb2aW_R9wb70VWgp+w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 5:07 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I reviewed the patch internally and tweaked a small detail of the apply worker
> to reduce the waiting time in the main loop when max_retention_duration is
> defined (set wait_time = min(wait_time, max_retention_duration)). Also, I added
> a simple test in 035_conflicts.pl of 0001 to verify the new sub option.
>
> Here is V70 patch set.
>
The patch v70-0001 looks good to me. Verified, all the old issues are resolved.
Will resume review of v70-0002 now.
thanks
Shveta
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mihail Nikalayeu | 2025-09-01 13:00:39 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-09-01 12:11:06 | Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster |