Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 5:28 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 2:38 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I tested the flows with
> > > > a) logical replication slot and get-changes.
> > > > b) filtered data flows: pub-sub creation with row_filters, 'publish'
> > > > options. I tried to verify plugin fields as compared to total_wal*
> > > > fields.
> > > > c) reset flow.
> > > >
> > > > While tests for a and c are present already. I don't see tests for b
> > > > anywhere when it comes to stats. Do you think we shall add a test for
> > > > filtered data using row-filter somewhere?
> > >
> > > Added a test in 028_row_filter. Please find it in the attached
> > > patchset.
> >
> > Test looks good.
>
> Thanks. Added to three more files. I think we have covered all the
> cases where filtering can occur.
>

Yes. The test looks good now.

thanks
Shveta