Re: synchronized_standby_slots used in logical replication

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: synchronized_standby_slots used in logical replication
Date: 2025-06-06 10:07:13
Message-ID: CAJpy0uBYvLx==yDa563YO9VGRDQkfd1D8utLp3-pjKt7tJdOqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 3:10 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for the detailed response. I will proceed with the native implementation for synchronizing logical replication slots.

Sure, thanks!

> In a maintenance context, when standby is shutdown, it's possible to temporarily disable the synchronized_standby_slots parameter to avoid blocking logical replication on the primary.

Right. That particular standby can be removed from the
'synchronized_standby_slots' list.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2025-06-06 10:31:25 Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2025-06-06 10:03:28 Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data