| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2026-05-21 06:01:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uAwNzaccXbmoi+3dHVmV3zjfj-y41UoLvJd-tn8oV4yeQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit, Vignesh,
A part of 007 patch is about preserving subscription-oid. Another
thread (origin migration) also needs the same logic as per discussion
at [1]. And there was a old thread which already attempted preserving
subscription-oid at [2], but the idea was rejected at that time. Why
don't we attempt to resume the same thread ([2]) and implement
preserving subscription-oid as a separate thread as we now have
multiple dependencies on it? Thoughts?
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2-uwpbJ8fnrssp%2BhORvOutsqRoZAsa05xVVzXe5Bt3bw%40mail.gmail.com
[2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALDaNm2Wj63VcbB0SY2NECHr1mKM1YSaV1ZydrdQVxyox2O2hg%40mail.gmail.com
thanks
Shveta
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2026-05-21 06:49:42 | Re: [PATCH] Release replication slot on error in SQL-callable slot functions |
| Previous Message | Jim Jones | 2026-05-21 05:53:46 | Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas |