Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
Date: 2026-07-08 06:27:37
Message-ID: CAJpy0uAiAwBABw51HBCHFHq_8b1qXGw1AJGt8QBY8mjxmDfstw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 11:51 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear Shveta,
>
> > For this reason, my inclination is to revert to the previous
> > implementation, where we compare old_cluster.nsubs with
> > max_active_replication_origins. But I'd like to hear what others think
> > before we make this change.
>
> But if origin created by users (or any extensions) have already been tracking the
> Remote_lsn, they should be taken into account. If there are three enabled
> subscriptions, two active user-created origins but the max_active_origin is set
> to three on the new node, the upgrading should fail.
>
> I prefer to preserve the current behavior of the patch, which compares
> max_active_origin and total number of origins. It might cause the false-positive,
> but even now it can happen. E.g., if there was a subscription which has never
> been enabled.
>

Okay, I missed this point earlier. I agree, let's retain the current
behaviour itself.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-07-08 06:28:00 Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-07-08 06:21:07 RE: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade