| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |
| Date: | 2025-08-14 03:32:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uAbLG9s2STFbJpAknWzDMnaDGOa4n2fTpLMAV9A0QjN5A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 5:42 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > 4)
> > For the DETAIL part of resume and stop messages, how about these:
> >
> > The retention duration for information used in conflict detection has
> > exceeded the limit of xx.
> > The retention duration for information used in conflict detection is
> > now within the acceptable limit of xx.
> > The retention duration for information used in conflict detection is
> > now indefinite.
> >
>
> Similar to the previous point, will it be better to keep it short by
> using "conflict detection info", for example, it will lead to message
> like "The retention duration for conflict detection info is now
> indefinite."?
>
Works for me as I understand the context. But could it be confusing
for users? Could it be inferred as info about conflicts rather than
info used while detecting conflicts?
thanks
Shveta
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-08-14 03:43:46 | Re: index prefetching |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2025-08-14 02:47:08 | Re: ALTER DOMAIN ADD NOT NULL NOT VALID |