From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
Date: | 2025-05-09 08:58:15 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uAb5MGXkSzvUJ4PivydCQXustOkuMC6bHhHxsEWhdiifQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 7:27 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks for the comments, the updated patch has the changes for the same.
>
Thanks for the patches. Please find few comments:
1)
patch004 commit msg:
- Drop published sequences are removed from pg_subscription_rel.
Drop -->Dropped
2)
copy_sequences:
LOG: Executing query :SELECT s.schname, s.seqname, ps.*, seq.seqtypid,
seq.seqstart, seq.seqincrement, seq.seqmin,
seq.seqmax, seq.seqcycle
FROM ( VALUES ('public', 'myseq1'), ('public', 'myseq3') ) AS s
(schname, seqname)
JOIN LATERAL pg_sequence_state(s.schname, s.seqname) ps ON true
....
Do we really need to log this query? If so, shall it be DEBUG1/DEBUG2?
3)
In log, we get:
------------------
LOG: logical replication synchronized 9 of 9 sequences for subscription "sub1"
WARNING: parameters differ for the remote and local sequences
("public.myseq1", "public.myseq3") for subscription "sub1"
LOG: logical replication synchronized 2 of 2 sequences for subscription "sub1"
WARNING: parameters differ for the remote and local sequences
("public.myseq1", "public.myseq3") for subscription "sub1"
------------------
This is confusing. I have 9 sequences, out of which 2 are mismatched.
So on REFRESH I get the first message as 'synchronized 9 of 9' and
later when it attempts to resynchronize pending ones automatically, it
keeps on displaying 'synchronized 2 of 2'.
Can we mention something like below:
-----------------
Unsynchronized sequences: 9, attempted in this batch: 9, succedded: 7,
mismatched/failed:2
So that if it is more than 100, say 120, it will say:
Unsynchronized sequences: 120, attempted in this batch: 100,
succedded: 98, mismatched/failed:2
And in next batch:
Unsynchronized sequences: 120, attempted in this batch: 20, succedded:
20, mismatched:0
And while attempting to synchronize failed ones, it will say:
Unsynchronized sequences: 2, attempted in this batch: 2, succedded: 0,
mismatched:2
-----------------
Please feel free to change the words. The intent is to get a clear
picture on what is happening.
4)
Why in patch001, we have 'pg_sequence_state' with one argument while
in 4ht patch it is changed to 2 args? Is it intentional to have it the
current way in patch001?
5)
Section1:
<para>
A new <firstterm>sequence synchronization worker</firstterm> will be started
after executing any of the above subscriber commands, and will exit once the
sequences are synchronized.
</para>
Section2:
<sect2 id="sequence-definition-mismatches">
<title>Sequence Definition Mismatches</title>
<warning>
<para>
During sequence synchronization, the sequence definitions of the publisher
and the subscriber are compared. A WARNING is logged if any differences
are detected.
</para>
</warning>
None of the section mentions that the synchronization worker will keep
on attempting to synchronize the failed/mismtached sequences until the
differences are resolved (provided disable_on_error is not enabled).
I think we can mention such a thing briefly in
'sequence-definition-mismatches' section.
thanks
Shveta
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sutou Kouhei | 2025-05-09 09:41:37 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |
Previous Message | Sutou Kouhei | 2025-05-09 08:51:27 | Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations |