Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve pg_sync_replication_slots() to wait for primary to advance
Date: 2025-12-11 03:07:03
Message-ID: CAJpy0uAM2chgTo=V-Du2bM37Ztwymtf88EahZ_0BMKx_3-hHNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 5:54 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> 0001 looks mostly good to me. I have made minor edits in the comments
> and added error_code for one of the error messages. Please check
> attached and let me know what you think?
>

v35 looks good to me.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ioseph Kim 2025-12-11 04:02:24 Re: Propose: Adding a '--enable-failover' option to 'pg_createsubscriber'
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-12-11 03:06:11 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits