Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2026-04-24 06:11:51
Message-ID: CAJpy0uADckX3O9AqoxV+ZX5yUTwwUQFsPFgLLyqtxm=hNnrR=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 3:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Nisha for the review. All your comments make sense so I have
> fixed them in the latest patch.
>

Hi Dilip,

Before we resume review, could you summarize any pending design points
(if any) from our last discussion? Sorry, I have lost track, a summary
will help.

thanks
Shveta

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mok 2026-04-24 06:15:48 Re: New vacuum config to avoid anti wraparound vacuums
Previous Message cca5507 2026-04-24 06:06:24 Make transformAExprIn() return a flattened bool expression directly