| From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2026-04-09 03:36:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAJpy0uA03itn+2tmzFQSxH8gE-rUBq3Te3rgC2ksFtHsjky7OQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 8:25 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I was just trying out Hou-san's suggestion and I came up with a
> > different approach. Attaching my modified test script.
> > If you think it is better, feel free to use it.
> >
>
> Thanks Ajin for sharing your version based on Hou-san's suggestions.
> This approach looks more robust and is also platform independent, so
> in my view we should proceed with it.
+1.
thanks
Shveta
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-04-09 03:42:36 | Re: [[deprecated("don't call this, call that")]] |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2026-04-09 03:34:30 | [[deprecated("don't call this, call that")]] |