Re: Missing word

From: Paweł Szymczyk <pawel(dot)szymczyk90(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing word
Date: 2025-05-13 15:24:35
Message-ID: CAJo0PvtBiDJw630vdpva-HdBZAcXeiBf3C7=kKkn==1h6RduMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Ok you are right, I get it now but still I think this can be written more
clearly.

wt., 13 maj 2025, 16:19 użytkownik Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napisał:

> PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > In the paragraph:
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIONING-DECLARATIVE-MAINTENANCE
> ,
> > sentence "Another option that is often preferable is to remove the
> partition
> > from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
> > right." there is missing "not" word. Correct form of this sentence should
> > be: Another option that is often preferable is to not remove the
> partition
> > from the partitioned table but retain access to it as a table in its own
> > right.
>
> AFAICS, it's correct as written.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tonny Hawk 2025-05-15 07:32:35 Re: Changes in CREATE EXTENSION from being an extension to statement
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-05-13 14:19:58 Re: Missing word