From: | Raj <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | kaido vaikla <kaido(dot)vaikla(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patroni set up |
Date: | 2025-07-02 10:17:05 |
Message-ID: | CAJk5AtYQDSuRtKgmfPPLnQhac=Gr+=oFYNLQASXN4s8=8Vb0Fw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
So what's the best architecture
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025, 14:28 kaido vaikla, <kaido(dot)vaikla(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Based on my opinion and setups.
> I would keep etcd cluster on separate nodes and separate data centre.
> Mumbai down means whole pg patroni cluster is down, because you dont have
> an etcd quorum. And other reasons, why create separet etcd cluster.
>
> Take a backup from leader. Leader donw means no replicas. Replica down
> does not mean leader down.
>
> br
> Kaido
>
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 10:38, Raj <rajeshkumar(dot)dba09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I am looking to DR set up patroni. For 5 node set up
>>
>> Mumbai: Node 1: postgres+etcd+patroni
>> Mumbai: Node 2: postgres+etcd+patroni
>> Chennai: Node 3: postgres+etcd+patroni
>>
>> Mumbai: haproxy+keepalived
>> Chennai: haproxy+keepalived
>>
>> Will this work? And I want to know in which node should I take daily
>> backup. Meaning- in which node I should configure pgbackrest backup
>>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | DINESH NAIR | 2025-07-02 10:19:07 | Re: Patroni set up |
Previous Message | kaido vaikla | 2025-07-02 08:58:18 | Re: Patroni set up |