Re: Relation extension scalability

From: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Relation extension scalability
Date: 2015-04-30 17:50:47
Message-ID: CAJjS0u3oVpuSAT8NviryeRNqA0nj8WEEXfSx=uRPqWF1=ORSVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Qingqing Zhou
<zhouqq(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Most commercial database employs a DMS storage model, where it manages
> object mapping and freespace itself. So different objects are sharing
> storage within several files. Surely it has historic reasons, but it
> has several advantages over current model:
> - remove fd pressure
> - remove double buffering (by introducing ADIO)
> - controlled layout and access pattern (sequential and read-ahead)
> - better quota management
> - performance potentially better
>
> Considering platforms supported and the stableness period needed, we
> shall support both current storage model and DMS model. I will stop
> here to see if this deserves further discussion.
>

Sorry, it might considered double-posting here but I am wondering have
we ever discussed this before? If we already have some conclusions on
this, could anyone share me a link?

Thanks,
Qingqing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-04-30 18:05:17 Re: ERROR: unexpected data beyond EOF
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2015-04-30 17:44:39 Re: Use outerPlanState() consistently in executor code