Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

From: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Date: 2021-08-16 08:30:46
Message-ID: CAJcOf-f4_Jhtxwc7WtVB3zTbiSfEmYJ=x=bMORhjBK+NePuZ=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 5:54 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here is another comment:
>
> +char *
> +logicalrep_message_type(LogicalRepMsgType action)
> +{
> ...
> + case LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_END:
> + return "STREAM END";
> ...
>
> I think most the existing code use "STREAM STOP" to describe the
> LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_END message, is it better to return "STREAM STOP" in
> function logicalrep_message_type() too ?
>

+1
I think you're right, it should be "STREAM STOP" in that case.

Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-08-16 08:32:47 Re: Failure of subscription tests with topminnow
Previous Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-08-16 07:53:52 RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side