| From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress |
| Date: | 2021-11-08 23:50:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAJcOf-dL5BM_BAo4n0t-VYeAOzSC-+BULdW7pzybR4BLN8WFZQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 7:11 PM osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure about the last part.
> > additionally increase the available subscriber memory,
> Which GUC parameter did you mean by this ?
> Could we point out and enalrge the memory size only for
> subscriber's apply processing intentionally ?
> I incorporated (7) except for this last part.
> Will revise according to your reply.
>
I might have misinterpreted your original description, so I'll
re-review that in your latest patch.
As a newer version (v20) of the prerequisite patch was posted a day
ago, it looks like your patch needs to be rebased against that (as it
currently applies on top of the v19 version only).
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-11-09 00:13:17 | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-11-08 23:42:44 | Re: Logical insert/update/delete WAL records for custom table AMs |