From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history |
Date: | 2021-11-30 01:15:32 |
Message-ID: | CAJcOf-cLSEXkiN2ASR+ER9M8NxPFzg8+UVsms+YgQXZUcj4sTQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:08 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > (BTW, the patches are in Windows CRLF format, so on Linux at least I
> > needed to convert them using dos2unix so they'd apply using Git)
>
> Hmm. Applying "od -c" to the copy of that message that's in my
> PG list folder shows clearly that there's no \r in it, nor do
> I see any when I save off the attachment. I suppose this must
> be an artifact of the way that your MUA treats text attachments;
> or maybe the mail got mangled on its way to you.
>
Yeah, sorry, looks like it could be a Gmail issue for me.
When I alternatively downloaded your patches from the pgsql-hackers
archive, they're in Unix format, as you say.
After a bit of investigation, it seems that patch attachments (like
yours) with a Context-Type of "text/x-diff" download through Gmail in
CRLF format for me (I'm running a browser on Windows, but my Postgres
development environment is in a Linux VM). So those must get converted
from Unix to CRLF format if downloaded using a browser running on
Windows.
The majority of patch attachments (?) seem to have a Context-Type of
"application/octet-stream" or "text/x-patch", and these seem to
download raw (in their original Unix format).
I guess the attachment context-type is varying according to the mail
client used for posting.
Sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-11-30 01:39:05 | RE: row filtering for logical replication |
Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2021-11-30 01:14:06 | Re: Can I assume relation would not be invalid during from ExecutorRun to ExecutorEnd |