| From: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |
| Date: | 2021-12-02 02:48:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAJcOf-c2NJ7VrToUjB8hyZAvWtaVoHm_EZ2yFG+PsA5Eu+JmGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:33 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > For publications of partitioned tables with publish_via_partition_root
> > set to true, the partitioned table itself (rather than the individual
> > partitions) is included in the view.
> >
>
> Okay, but I think it is better to add the behavior both when
> publish_via_partition_root is set to true and false. As in the case of
> false, it won't include the partitioned table itself.
>
If you updated my original description to say "(instead of just the
individual partitions)", it would imply the same I think.
But I don't mind if you want to explicitly state both cases to make it clear.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-12-02 03:02:08 | Re: pg_replslotdata - a tool for displaying replication slot information |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-12-02 02:47:06 | Re: O(n) tasks cause lengthy startups and checkpoints |