| From: | kedar anavardekar <kedar(dot)anavardekar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, saurabh singh <saurabh(dot)singh214(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2026-09-25 05:40:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAJZSXGoXwfu=H-GkmrvAEkrV9V=p-c7Wdk=eAZPuHSeBxj6N6g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Nisha,
Thank you for the patch. I applied it locally, and it compiles successfully.
I have a few suggestions for consideration for v75. Please treat these
as optional review comments;
you and the others can decide whether they are important enough to address.
Otherwise, feel free to ignore them.
> Attached are the updated patches:
> v75-001: Merged v74 patches 001 and 002 into a single patch.
> v75-002: Includes the discussed fix, along with TAP tests covering
> both cases. Also updated the documentation with an example.
>
1. Documentation:
In the example query, could the hard-coded table name:
pg_conflict.pg_conflict_log_16392
be replaced with a placeholder such as:
pg_conflict_log_<subid>
which is used at other places in doc.
2. Documentation:
The documentation says that values larger than 1 kB are omitted.
However, the implementation
measures raw detoasted storage size rather than textual output size.
This distinction may
matter for custom types, arrays, compressed values, and JSON-like types.
3. Code:
In:
+ return PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text_with_len(result.data, result.len));
`result.data` does not appear to be released after the text datum is created.
Could this accumulate memory when multiple conflicts occur in one
apply transaction?
4. Code:
The name `tuple_table_slot_to_indextup_json` was not immediately clear to me.
Since the function serializes index key values rather than an index tuple,
would something like `tuple_table_slot_to_index_key_json` be more descriptive?
5. Code:
Is the following variable necessary? It appears not to be used currently:
+ bool typisvarlena;
Thanks again for the work.
Regards,
Kedar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2026-09-25 05:52:21 | RE: Allow pg_read_all_stats to read replication origin status |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-09-25 05:30:39 | Re: Fix -Wshadow=local warnings |