From: | Radovan Jablonovsky <radovan(dot)jablonovsky(at)replicon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17 |
Date: | 2012-08-08 20:04:10 |
Message-ID: | CAJYcdTsgGYacbAs1St3CuSJRHr7ANHDH4t04CxCiEXfqbX+ekg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Currently there are maximum 600 connections.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Radovan Jablonovsky
> <radovan(dot)jablonovsky(at)replicon(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks you for your response.
> >
> > Database config:
> > shared_buffers = 8GB
> > temp_buffers = 32MB
> > work_mem = 64MB
> > maintenance_work_mem = 512MB
> > effective_cache_size = 16GB
> >
> > In usual load there are not much pressure on memory, but it is possible
> to
> > have all clients start using heavy reports. They are valid requests and
> > could consume all memory. In this border and not likely but possible
> > scenario it could be useful to let OOM killer to kill client's
> > processes/connections but leave PostgreSQL system processes (postmaster,
> > writer, stat, log, streaming, ...) excluded from reach of OOM killer.
>
> You're only realistic solution is to either limit the incoming
> connections via a connection pooler like pgbouncer or to lower your
> work_mem to something smaller. What's you're current max connections
> setting?
>
--
*Radovan Jablonovsky* | SaaS DBA | Phone 1-403-262-6519 (ext. 256) | Fax
1-403-233-8046****
*
Replicon | Hassle-Free Time & Expense Management Software - 7,300 Customers
- 70 Countries
www.replicon.com | facebook <http://www.facebook.com/Replicon.inc> |
twitter<http://twitter.com/Replicon>
| blog <http://www.replicon.com/blog/> | contact
us<http://www.replicon.com/about_replicon/contact_us.aspx>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-08-08 20:24:08 | Re: PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17 |
Previous Message | Amador Alvarez | 2012-08-08 17:34:54 | Re: standby with a fixed lag behind the master |