From: | Tejasvi Kashi <mail(at)tejasvi(dot)dev> |
---|---|
To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to check for in-progress transactions |
Date: | 2023-03-16 21:08:17 |
Message-ID: | CAJWWkaqsrBjz9Nc42ponaYQCBK-HsO8s2=UNjSdwBsp4fYk2mQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 17:01, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 4:43 PM Tejasvi Kashi <mail(at)tejasvi(dot)dev> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your reply. It looks like this is exactly what I need.
> For my use case, I'm trying to get read-only transactions to wait for the
> replication of prior writes.
>
> can't you use remote_apply?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/runtime-config-wal.html
That will ensure that the writes are acknowledged only after remote
application. But, in my case, I’m trying to get read transactions to wait
if they have seen a write that is yet to be replicated.
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/runtime-config-wal.html>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2023-03-16 21:11:59 | Re: doc: mentioned CREATE+ATTACH PARTITION as an alternative to CREATE TABLE..PARTITION OF |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2023-03-16 21:01:23 | Re: How to check for in-progress transactions |