Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

On 12/26/18, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I wonder if we could do something really simple like a lookup based on
> the first character of the scan keyword. It looks to me like there are
> 440 keywords right now, and the most common starting letter is 'c',
> which is the first letter of 51 keywords. So dispatching based on the
> first letter clips at least 3 steps off the binary search. I don't
> know whether that's enough to be worthwhile, but it's probably pretty
> simple to implement.

Using radix tree structures for the top couple of node levels is a
known technique to optimize tries that need to be more space-efficient
at lower levels, so this has precedent. In this case there would be a
space trade off of

(alphabet size, rounded up) * (size of index to lower boundary + size
of index to upper boundary) = 32 * (2 + 2) = 128 bytes

which is pretty small compared to what we'll save by offset-based
lookup. On average, there'd be 4.1 binary search steps, which is nice.
I agree it'd be fairly simple to do, and might raise the bar for doing
anything more complex.

-John Naylor