| From: | John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
| Date: | 2018-06-19 13:48:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAJVSVGVfVuatPOX6Rzz6zKbTGsozC=K+L+W=q1=rLPUM3=JoBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/20/18, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Regression tests of pg_upgrade are failing as follows:
> New cluster database "postgres" is not empty
> Failure, exiting
> + rm -rf /tmp/pg_upgrade_check-Xn0ZLe
I looked into this briefly. The error comes from
check_new_cluster_is_empty() in src/bin/pg_upgrade/check.c, which
contains the comment
/* pg_largeobject and its index should be skipped */
If you don't create a toast table for pg_largeobject and
pg_largeobject_metadata, the pg_upgrade regression test passes.
Revised addendum attached. Adding two more exceptions to my alternate
implementation starts to make it ugly, so I haven't updated it for
now.
-John Naylor
> Michael
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| toastable-catalogs-02-JCN-addendum1-v2.diff | text/plain | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Finzel | 2018-06-19 13:50:17 | Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid |
| Previous Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2018-06-19 13:44:17 | Re: Server crashed with TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(parallel_workers > 0)" when partitionwise_aggregate true. |